Skip to main content
Tera Compute

Event

Participation Rules

Last updated: 12 August 2026

These Participation Rules apply to Tera Compute's Prodigy Ideathon — Cohort One and should be read together with the Terms & Conditions and other official Programme communications.

1. Eligibility and Team Formation

1.1

Prodigy Ideathon is open to students from Classes 9–12 through participating schools.

1.2

Each team must consist of 2–4 students.

1.3

Teams must participate through their registered school and comply with the eligibility requirements communicated by the organisers.

1.4

Each participating student is expected to contribute meaningfully to the team's submission and presentation.

2. Competition Pathway

The competition will progress through the following stages:

Stage 1 — School Pitching Round

All registered teams from the participating school will participate in the School Pitching Round.

Teams will present their solution to a judging panel consisting of:

  • One judge nominated by the participating school, and
  • One judge appointed by Tera Compute.

Depending on the number of participating teams, Tera Compute may organise multiple judging panels to conduct the round efficiently within school hours.

Stage 2 — School Finale

The top three teams from each judging panel will advance to the School Finale.

Where multiple judging panels are used, the shortlisted teams from all panels will present before a combined judging panel.

The School Finale will determine the:

1st Place · 2nd Place · 3rd Place

teams representing that school.

Stage 3 — Grand Finale

The 1st, 2nd and 3rd place teams from each participating school will qualify for the Grand Finale.

These teams will compete against finalists from other participating schools before the Grand Finale judging panel.

The final rankings will determine the overall:

Champion · Runner-Up · Second Runner-Up

of Prodigy Ideathon Cohort One.

3. Pitch Format

School Pitching Round

3 min pitch

2 min Q&A

Teams must present their idea within the allotted pitch duration.

School Finale

5 min pitch

2 min Q&A

Shortlisted teams will present their refined solution and respond to questions from the combined judging panel.

Grand Finale

5 min pitch

3 min Q&A

Finalist teams will present their solution before the Grand Finale judging panel.

Teams may be asked to stop their presentation if they substantially exceed the allotted time.

4. Pitch Deck Requirements

4.1

Teams must prepare their presentation using the official Prodigy Ideathon pitch-deck format or guidelines provided by Tera Compute.

4.2

The pitch should clearly communicate:

  • The problem being addressed
  • Why the problem matters
  • Research or evidence supporting the problem
  • The proposed innovation
  • How the solution works
  • Expected impact
  • Feasibility or implementation considerations
4.3

Teams are responsible for ensuring that their presentation is complete, accurate and ready before their scheduled pitch.

4.4

Any specific submission deadlines, file-format requirements or presentation instructions communicated separately by Tera Compute will also apply.

5. Judging Criteria

The total judging score is 50 points.

Each criterion carries 10 points:

CriterionMaximum Score
Problem — How important is the problem?10
Innovation — How new and creative is the idea?10
Solution — How well does the idea solve the problem?10
Impact — How much difference can it make?10
Presentation — How clearly is the idea explained?10
Total50

Judges will score teams independently according to the applicable judging rubric.

Tie-Break Procedure

In the event of a tie, the following order will be applied:

  1. Higher Solution score
  2. Higher Impact score
  3. Jury deliberation, where required

The final determination following the applicable tie-break procedure will be treated as the result for that round.

6. Integrity and Prohibited Conduct

Teams must submit original work or appropriately attribute material belonging to third parties.

The following are prohibited:

  • Plagiarism
  • Unauthorised copying
  • Impersonation
  • Fabrication or manipulation of evidence
  • Deliberate misrepresentation of research or results
  • Abusive, threatening or discriminatory conduct
  • Deliberate disruption of the event
  • Attempts to manipulate judging or qualification
  • Unauthorised access to Programme systems or accounts
  • Any conduct that compromises the fairness, safety or integrity of the competition

Participants must comply with reasonable instructions from organisers, school coordinators, judges and event personnel.

7. AI Use Policy

7.1

The use of AI tools for ideation, research, brainstorming, drafting or other permitted purposes is allowed where consistent with the instructions provided for the relevant event.

7.2

Teams remain responsible for understanding and being able to explain their own ideas, research, solution and presentation.

7.3

AI-generated content must not be presented as independently verified fact without appropriate review.

7.4

Teams are responsible for the accuracy, originality, ethical use and integrity of their final submission.

7.5

Teams must not use AI tools to impersonate another participant, fabricate evidence, manipulate judging, or otherwise circumvent the Programme rules.

7.6

Tera Compute may introduce additional AI-use requirements for a particular round where necessary to maintain fairness and academic integrity.

8. Presentation and Team Participation

8.1

All team members should be familiar with the submitted idea and presentation.

8.2

Judges may direct questions to any member of the team.

8.3

Teams should be prepared to explain the reasoning behind their problem selection, research, solution and expected impact.

8.4

Teams must remain available at the time communicated by the school or event organisers.

8.5

Failure to appear for a scheduled pitch without an approved reason may result in the team being unable to participate in that round.

9. Violation Outcomes

Depending on the nature and severity of a confirmed violation, the organisers and/or judges may apply one or more of the following measures:

  • Warning
  • Score penalty
  • Removal of a submission or presentation element
  • Disqualification from the relevant round
  • Withdrawal of qualification
  • Withdrawal of recognition or award
  • Restriction from participation in the current Programme
  • Restriction from participation in future Prodigy Ideathon cohorts

The response will be proportionate to the nature and seriousness of the violation.

10. Final Authority

Tera Compute may issue reasonable operational instructions and clarifications necessary to conduct the Programme fairly and safely.

Where an issue is not specifically addressed in these Participation Rules, the organisers may make a reasonable determination consistent with the objectives, integrity and structure of the Programme.

Any material updates to these rules will be communicated through official Programme channels where reasonably practicable.

11. Contact

For questions regarding eligibility, participation rules, pitch requirements or event procedures, please contact Tera Compute through the official contact details below.

Tera Compute LLP

Registered Office

E-358, Street Number 6,

West Vinod Nagar,

Delhi – 110092, India

Website: https://teracompute.co/

Email: teracompute@gmail.com

Programme: Tera Compute's Prodigy Ideathon — Cohort One

Related: Terms & Conditions · Contact

© 2026 Tera Compute LLP. All rights reserved.