06Experts & jury

Who guides and judges the programme

Expert-led workshops and judging coordination are led by Tera Compute's resource people. Every School Round panel also includes one judge nominated by the participating school.

Who are the mentors and judges at Prodigy Ideathon?

Prodigy Ideathon's expert-led sessions are delivered by Dr. Tanveer Ikram (Senior AI & Technology Expert and International AI Trainer), Akshat Malhotra (Applied AI & Hardware Systems Builder and Co-Founder of Tera Compute LLP) and Muskan Malhotra (Communication & Confidence facilitator). Judging is coordinated by Tera Compute: each School Round panel pairs one school-nominated judge with one Tera Compute judge, and named Grand Jury members are announced ahead of the Grand Finale.

01 Experts & resource people

Confirmed for Cohort 1

Dr. Tanveer Ikram

Senior AI & Technology Expert · International AI Trainer

Strategic Mentor & Resource Person, Tera Compute

Experience

  • 30+ years across education, software development, digital transformation and applied innovation.
  • Has worked across Australia, New Zealand, Malaysia and Singapore.
  • Former Professor (CSE–AI) and former Head, Software Development Cell at IPEC.

Focus areas

  • AI Fundamentals
  • Generative AI
  • AI Agents
  • Responsible AI
  • AI + Sustainability
  • Computational Thinking
  • +3 more

Akshat Malhotra

Student Technology & Innovation Resource Person

Co-Founder, Tera Compute LLP

Experience

  • Applied AI and hardware systems builder with a build-and-demonstrate teaching approach.
  • IoT and robotics practitioner working with Classes 9–12 on applied engineering systems.

Focus areas

  • Applied AI
  • IoT
  • Robotics
  • Electronics & Embedded Systems
  • Computer Vision
  • Intelligent Automation
  • +3 more

Muskan Malhotra

Communication & Confidence Facilitator

Aviation Professional · Customer Experience Specialist · 7+ years

Experience

  • Cabin-crew and customer-experience specialist bringing crew-resource-management practice into the classroom.
  • Leads sessions on communication, composure under pressure and teamwork for students and educators.

Focus areas

  • Communication & Confidence
  • Decision-making under pressure
  • Teamwork (lessons from CRM)
  • Professional Etiquette
  • Handling People & Conflict
Portfolio on request

02 The judging model

How the jury is put together

Every judge scores independently against the same 50-mark rubric. Judges’ decisions are final.

  • School Round · External judge Scores every team on the 50-mark rubric Appointed by Tera Compute
  • School Round · School judge Scores independently alongside the external judge Nominated by the participating school
  • School Finale · Combined panel Decides School Champion, Runner-Up and Third Place Coordinated by Tera Compute
  • Grand Finale · Grand Jury Decides the Champion, Runner-Up and Second Runner-Up Announced ahead of the Grand Finale
Grand Jury · being confirmed

Named jurors are published before the Grand Finale

We don't list jurors before they are confirmed. If you are an industry practitioner or subject expert interested in judging a School Round, Finale or the Grand Jury, we'd like to hear from you.

Register your interest →

Get involved

Bring your expertise to the next generation

Lead a session, judge a round, or shape a challenge theme. Partnerships and mentor roles are open for Cohort 1.